RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedElite vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FUNDE2
FundedElite
EST. 2023
FNDF
FundedFast
FUNDEDELITE
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
58/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$39BETTER
MIN COST
—$49
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FUNDEDELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
FundedElite PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
- +On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedElite CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy