RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedElite vs Blue Guardian
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FUNDE2
FundedElite
EST. 2023
BLGD
Blue Guardian
FUNDEDELITE
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—55/100
2.75/5—
RATING
BETTER3/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$39
MIN COST
—
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
3BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1
FUNDEDELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
FundedElite PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
- +On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedElite CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy