RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
Topstep
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FTUK
METRIC
TOPSTEP
65/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER69/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—3/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$119—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
20%—
PASS RATE
BETTER28%
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—3

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, beginner

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Topstep PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
  • +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Lower trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Topstep
Higher trust score (69/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Topstep Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy