RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTUK vs The Funded Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
TFTR
The Funded Trader
FTUK
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$119BETTER
MIN COST
—$489
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
20%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FTUK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, large-cap
THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader
FTUK PROS
- +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
- +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility
FTUK CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
- −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation
The Funded Trader PROS
- +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
- +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
- +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.
The Funded Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
- −Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy