RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTUK vs Pip Traders Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
FTUK
METRIC
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—40/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$119
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FTUK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, large-cap
PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FTUK PROS
- +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
- +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility
FTUK CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
- −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation
Pip Traders Funding PROS
- +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
- +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
- +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
- +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
Pip Traders Funding CONS
- −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
- −Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy