RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
FTUK
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—59/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$119BETTER
MIN COST
—$200
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Lark Funding PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Lark Funding
Lower trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Lark Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy