RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
LCDT
Lucid Trading
FTUK
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$119—
MIN COST
BETTER$90
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
20%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy