RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
FTUK
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$119
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
20%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Kershner Trading Group Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy