RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Goat Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
Goat Funded
GOAT
Goat Funded
EST. 2023
FTUK
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—62/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—3.43/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
$119—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—2d
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—3

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
TradeLocker, MT5

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Goat Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Goat Funded
Lower trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Goat Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy