RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Goat Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
GFFU
Goat Funded Futures
FTUK
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED FUTURES
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—45/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$119
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—2

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Futures

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Goat Funded Futures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
  • +Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
  • +Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
  • +Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

Goat Funded Futures CONS

  • −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
  • −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
  • −Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Goat Funded Futures
Lower trust score (45/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Goat Funded Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy