RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTUK vs For Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
FTUK
METRIC
FOR TRADERS
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—58/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—3/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$300,000
$119—
MIN COST
BETTER$42
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—2d
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1
FTUK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, large-cap
FOR TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
FTUK PROS
- +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
- +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility
FTUK CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
- −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation
For Traders PROS
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
For Traders CONS
- −Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
- −News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy