RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
FTUK
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—59/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$119—
MIN COST
BETTER$1
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—2

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Lower trust score (59/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy