RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTUK vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
AQFT
AquaFutures
FTUK
METRIC
AQUAFUTURES
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—43/100
4.44/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$119
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
20%
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

AquaFutures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
  • +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
  • +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
  • +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

  • −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
  • −Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
  • −Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTUK
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
AquaFutures
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTUK Full Review →AquaFutures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy