RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP

Funded Trading Plus

EST. 2021

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

FUNDED TRADING PLUS

METRIC

SAVIUS

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

3.5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$100,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$1,759—

MIN COST

BETTER$285

3dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS: cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Funded Trading Plus PROS

+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
+Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
+Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

−Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus

Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FTTP