RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs PipFarm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP
Funded Trading Plus
EST. 2021
PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
FUNDED TRADING PLUS
METRIC
PIPFARM
60/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER85%
$100,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$200,000
$1,759—
MIN COST
BETTER$45
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS
cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

Funded Trading Plus PROS

  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
  • +Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
  • +Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

  • −Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
  • −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus
Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Trading Plus Full Review →PipFarm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy