RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP
Funded Trading Plus
EST. 2021
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
FUNDED TRADING PLUS
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$100,000
MAX FUNDING
$1,759
MIN COST
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS
cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Funded Trading Plus PROS

  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
  • +Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
  • +Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
  • Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Trading Plus Full Review →Kershner Trading Group Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy