RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs For Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP

Funded Trading Plus

EST. 2021

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

FUNDED TRADING PLUS

METRIC

FOR TRADERS

60/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER65/100

3.5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$100,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$1,759—

MIN COST

BETTER$42

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS: cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

Funded Trading Plus PROS

+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
+Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
+Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

−Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus

Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FTTP