RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Trading Plus vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTTP
Funded Trading Plus
EST. 2021
FNDF
FundedFast
FUNDED TRADING PLUS
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$100,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$1,759—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Funded Trading Plus PROS
- +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
- +Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
- +Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX
Funded Trading Plus CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Trading Plus
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy