RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP

Funded Trading Plus

EST. 2021

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

FUNDED TRADING PLUS

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

3.5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$100,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$250,000

$1,759—

MIN COST

BETTER$81

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS: cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

Funded Trading Plus PROS

+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
+Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
+Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

−Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus

Higher trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FTTP