RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP
Funded Trading Plus
EST. 2021
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
FUNDED TRADING PLUS
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
60/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER62/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$100,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$200,000
$1,759—
MIN COST
BETTER$79
3d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS
cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Funded Trading Plus PROS

  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
  • +Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
  • +Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

  • −Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
  • −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Trading Plus Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy