RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Trading Plus vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTTP
Funded Trading Plus
EST. 2021
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
FUNDED TRADING PLUS
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
60/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
54/100
3.5/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$100,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$1,759
MIN COST
BETTER$1
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED TRADING PLUS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Other Commodities, FX
PLATFORMS
cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Funded Trading Plus PROS

  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
  • +Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
  • +Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

Funded Trading Plus CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
  • Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Trading Plus
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Trading Plus Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy