RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs V Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
VPRT
V Prop Trader
FTMO
METRIC
V PROP TRADER
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER95%
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$155
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
22%
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

V PROP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, VTrader

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

V Prop Trader PROS

  • +Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
  • +Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.

V Prop Trader CONS

  • No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
  • Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
  • Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
V Prop Trader
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 95% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →V Prop Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy