Compare/FTMO vs Tradeify

FTMO vs Tradeify

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO DETAILS

MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Rithmic, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Tradesea, WealthCharts, R Trader
TYPES: futures, fast-payout

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
+Fee refund is available
+Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
+Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
+A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
−News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
+Single evaluation step beats the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
+Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms.
+Payout window of 5 days is faster than the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.

−Max funding of $150,000 is well below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
−Min challenge cost of $99 exceeds the average of $69.4 across listed firms.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.

FTMO

Trust score 65/100. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.

Tradeify

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (5d). 90% profit split.