RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
Topstep
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FTMO
METRIC
TOPSTEP
65/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER69/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—3/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$155—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
22%—
PASS RATE
BETTER28%
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, beginner

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Topstep PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
  • +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Lower trust score (65/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Topstep
Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Topstep Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy