RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTMO vs The Funded Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
TFTR
The Funded Trader
FTMO
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$155BETTER
MIN COST
—$489
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
22%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FTMO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
The Funded Trader PROS
- +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
- +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
- +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.
The Funded Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
- −Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy