RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs Traders Launch

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
TDLC
Traders Launch
FTMO
METRIC
TRADERS LAUNCH
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—56/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—2.1/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$155
MIN COST
—
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
22%
PASS RATE
—
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

TRADERS LAUNCH DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Traders Launch PROS

  • +Daily payout frequency is highly competitive, offering traders faster access to funds than most firms.
  • +Days to first payout at 7 is close to the industry average of 6.5, reflecting a reasonable wait time.
  • +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
  • +No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.

Traders Launch CONS

  • −Very limited data is provided, making full comparison to industry averages impossible across most metrics.
  • −Without profit split, funding size, or challenge cost data, overall value cannot be properly assessed.
  • −Lack of transparency on drawdown, targets, and steps to funded limits trader decision-making confidence.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (65/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Traders Launch
Lower trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 7d.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Traders Launch Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy