FTMO vs Trading Cult
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | FTMO ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015 | Trading Cult EST. 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 65/100BETTER | 54/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14dTIE | 14dTIE |
| MIN COST | $99BETTER | $107 |
| MAX FUNDING | $200,000TIE | $200,000TIE |
| RATING | 4.5/5 | 5/5BETTER |
| REVIEW COUNT | 2BETTER | 1 |
| STEPS | 2-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Fixed | Trailing |
FTMO DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
TRADING CULT DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- Fast Payout, Instant Funding
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Trading Cult PROS
- +Overall drawdown allowance of 8% exceeds the listed-firms average of 7.9%, giving traders slightly more room.
- +Single-step evaluation is below the listed-firms average of 1.6 steps, reaching funded faster.
- +News trading is permitted, allowing traders to hold positions through high-volatility events.
- +Three platform options (MT4, MT5, cTrader) provide flexibility across popular trading environments.
Trading Cult CONS
- −Minimum challenge cost of $107 is above the listed-firms average of $69.4, making entry more expensive.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed-firms average of 83.2%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Maximum funding of $200,000 is below the listed-firms average of $310,294.1, capping earning potential.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy