HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
FTMO vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | FTMO ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015 | Savius EST. 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 69/100BETTER | 60/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%TIE | 90%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | 3dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $155BETTER | $285 |
| MAX FUNDING | $400,000BETTER | $300,000 |
| RATING | 4.45/5BETTER | 4/5 |
| REVIEW COUNT | 4BETTER | 1 |
| STEPS | 2-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Fixed | Fixed |
FTMO DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
SAVIUS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
