RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
FTMO
METRIC
QT FUNDED
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—64/100
4/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
$155—
MIN COST
BETTER$12
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
22%
PASS RATE
—
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (65/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
QT Funded
Lower trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy