RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs PipFarm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
FTMO
METRIC
PIPFARM
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—56/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—85%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$155—
MIN COST
BETTER$45
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
22%
PASS RATE
—
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (65/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
PipFarm
Lower trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →PipFarm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy