RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs Optimal Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
OPTM
Optimal Traders
FTMO
METRIC
OPTIMAL TRADERS
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—49/100
4/5—
RATING
BETTER4.33/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$155
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
22%
PASS RATE
—
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER4

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

OPTIMAL TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Optimal Traders PROS

  • +The firm name implies an optimisation-focused approach to trader evaluation and development.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
  • +A structured funding model, if present, could support disciplined and performance-driven traders.
  • +Potential for competitive terms cannot be ruled out without further data disclosure.

Optimal Traders CONS

  • −No data whatsoever has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • −Traders cannot make any informed decisions without full disclosure of this firm's core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Optimal Traders
Lower trust score (49/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Optimal Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy