HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
FTMO vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | FTMO ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015 | Lucid Trading |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 69/100BETTER | 63/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%TIE | 90%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | 1dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $155 | $90BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $400,000 | — |
| RATING | 4.45/5 | 4.67/5BETTER |
| REVIEW COUNT | 4BETTER | 2 |
| STEPS | 2-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Fixed | Trailing EOD |
FTMO DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
