RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
FTMO
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$155
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
22%
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Kershner Trading Group Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy