RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTMO vs Great Point Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
GPCP
Great Point Capital
FTMO
METRIC
GREAT POINT CAPITAL
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—43/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$155
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
22%
PASS RATE
—
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—1
FTMO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
GREAT POINT CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Great Point Capital PROS
- +US-based firm may benefit from operating in a well-regulated and established financial environment.
- +Great Point Capital name suggests an institutionally oriented approach to trader funding.
- +US location may provide access to a broad range of market instruments and trading hours.
- +Presence on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public accountability and visibility.
Great Point Capital CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
- −Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy