RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FTMO vs Glow Node

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
GLWN
Glow Node
FTMO
METRIC
GLOW NODE
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—60/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—3.5/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$155
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
22%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Glow Node PROS

  • +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

  • −Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
  • −No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
  • −Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Glow Node
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Glow Node Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy