RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTMO vs Get Funded Now
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
GFND
Get Funded Now
FTMO
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$155—
MIN COST
BETTER$123
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
22%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FTMO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Get Funded Now PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
Get Funded Now CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy