PropDNA
⌘K
Compare/FTMO vs Goat Funded Futures
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FTMO vs Goat Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
GFFU
Goat Funded Futures
EST. 2024
TRUST SCORE69/100BETTER63/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%90%BETTER
PAYOUT DAYS14d2dBETTER
MIN COST$99BETTER$134
MAX FUNDING$200,000BETTER$150,000
RATING4.45/5BETTER3.33/5
REVIEW COUNT4TIE4TIE
STEPS2-step1-step
DRAWDOWNFixedEOD Trailing

FTMO DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Goat Funded Futures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
  • +Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
  • +Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
  • +Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

Goat Funded Futures CONS

  • No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
  • Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (69/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Goat Funded Futures
Lower trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Goat Funded Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy