RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTMO vs Goat Funded Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
GFFU
Goat Funded Futures
FTMO
METRIC
GOAT FUNDED FUTURES
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—45/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$155
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
22%
PASS RATE
—
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2
FTMO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Futures
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Goat Funded Futures PROS
- +Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
- +Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
- +Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
- +Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.
Goat Funded Futures CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
- −Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy