PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Compare/FTMO vs Genk Capital
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FTMO vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
TRUST SCORE69/100BETTER47/100
PROFIT SPLIT90%
PAYOUT DAYS14d
MIN COST$155
MAX FUNDING$400,000
RATING4.45/5BETTER4.33/5
REVIEW COUNT4BETTER2
STEPS2-step
DRAWDOWNFixed

FTMO DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Genk Capital
Lower trust score (47/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Genk Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy