RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FTMO vs Fuze Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
FUZE
Fuze Traders
FTMO
METRIC
FUZE TRADERS
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$155
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
22%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FTMO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
FUZE TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FTMO PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
- +Fee refund is available
- +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
- +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
- +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.
FTMO CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
- −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.
Fuze Traders PROS
- +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
- +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
- +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
- +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.
Fuze Traders CONS
- −No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
- −Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
- −Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy