PropDNA
⌘K
Compare/FTMO vs Funded Futures Network
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

FTMO vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
TRUST SCORE65/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS14d0dBETTER
MIN COST$99BETTER$135
MAX FUNDING$200,000$250,000BETTER
RATING4.4/5
REVIEW COUNT2BETTER0
STEPS2-step1-step
DRAWDOWNFixedEOD Trailing

FTMO DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Onyx, Quantower, EdgeProX, MotiveWave, NinjaTrader

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

Funded Futures Network PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
  • Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FTMO
Trust score 65/100. Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Funded Futures Network
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FTMO Full Review →Funded Futures Network Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy