FuturesElite vs TX3 Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, ATAS, Volumetrica, DeepDom, DeepCharts

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptional, far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $65 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility for funded traders

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings
−Overall drawdown of 5% is meaningfully below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7

FuturesElite

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

TX3 Funding

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.