RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FuturesElite vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTEL

FuturesElite

TOPS

Topstep

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012

FUTURESELITE

METRIC

TOPSTEP

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER66/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

100%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—90%

$150,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$150,000

$79—

MIN COST

BETTER$49

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

28%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, beginner

FuturesElite PROS

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

Topstep PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
+Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FuturesElite

Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.

START WITH FTEL