RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FuturesElite vs Lark Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTEL
FuturesElite
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
FUTURESELITE
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$200,000
$79BETTER
MIN COST
—$200
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUTURESELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas
LARK FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
FuturesElite PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.
FuturesElite CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
- −No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.
Lark Funding PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.
Lark Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy