RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FuturesElite vs Limitless Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTEL
FuturesElite
LMTF
Limitless Funding
FUTURESELITE
METRIC
LIMITLESS FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$79
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUTURESELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas
LIMITLESS FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FuturesElite PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.
FuturesElite CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
- −No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.
Limitless Funding PROS
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
Limitless Funding CONS
- −Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
- −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy