RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FuturesElite vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTEL

FuturesElite

LCDT

Lucid Trading

FUTURESELITE

METRIC

LUCID TRADING

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

100%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—90%

$150,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$79BETTER

MIN COST

—$90

1dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

FuturesElite PROS

+Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
−No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

Lucid Trading PROS

+Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
+Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

−No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
−Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

FuturesElite

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.

START WITH FTEL