RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FuturesElite vs ICFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FTEL
FuturesElite
ICFD
ICFunded
FUTURESELITE
METRIC
ICFUNDED
59/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
56/100
4/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$500,000
$79
MIN COST
BETTER$74
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

FuturesElite PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
  • No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FuturesElite
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.
ICFunded
Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FuturesElite Full Review →ICFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy