RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FuturesElite vs Glow Node
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FTEL
FuturesElite
GLWN
Glow Node
FUTURESELITE
METRIC
GLOW NODE
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$79
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUTURESELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas
GLOW NODE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
FuturesElite PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.
FuturesElite CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
- −No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.
Glow Node PROS
- +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
Glow Node CONS
- −Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
- −No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
- −Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy