Compare/For Traders vs OneUp Trader

For Traders vs OneUp Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Min challenge cost of $48 is below the listed firms' average of $69.4, reducing entry cost.
+Single evaluation step beats the listed firms' average of 1.6 steps, reaching funding faster.
+Offers three platforms (cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker) and five markets including Crypto and Futures.
+Weekend holding is permitted, giving traders more flexibility to manage open positions.

−Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms' average of 83.2%, reducing trader earnings.
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms' average of $310,294.1, limiting scale.
−Payout window of 14 days exceeds the listed firms' average of 9.6 days, meaning longer waits.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
+Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
+Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
+Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.

−Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
−Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.

For Traders

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.

OneUp Trader

Trust score 64/100. Faster payouts (1d). 90% profit split.