RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs ICFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

For Traders
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
ICFD
ICFunded
FOR TRADERS
METRIC
ICFUNDED
58/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
56/100
3/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$500,000
$42BETTER
MIN COST
$74
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

For Traders PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

  • Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
  • News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders
Higher trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.
ICFunded
Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

For Traders Full Review →ICFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy