RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs Goat Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

GOAT

Goat Funded

EST. 2023

FOR TRADERS

METRIC

GOAT FUNDED

65/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—63/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$300,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$42BETTER

MIN COST

—$49

2dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE2d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

GOAT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: TradeLocker, MT5

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

Goat Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

Goat Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders

Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FORT